California State University, San
Bernardino
Department of Biology / College of
Natural Sciences
Biology 622 – Seminar in
Zoology; Basal Amniota
Dr. Stuart S. Sumida
Winter 2014; Thursday 10:00-11:50;
BI-101
ENROLLMENT: STUDENTS MUST BE ENROLLED IN THE COURSE
TO PARTICIPATE IN LECTURES AND CLASS EXERCISES. ENROLLMENT IN BIOLOGY 622 CONSTITUTES
LEGAL ACCEPTANCE OF ALL THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY.
Course Information
Course Description
Survey of
the structure and evolutionary relationships of basal members of the vertebrate
clade Amniota. Each of the major groups of Diadectomorpha, Eureptilia, and Parareptilia will
be examined in terms of structure phylogenetic relationships, temporal
distribution, and paleobiogeographic distribution.
Two hours lecture and plus student presentations. Prerequisite: BIOL 342
or an equivalent course from another institution is required. BIOL 524 strongly
recommended. This course is a
Biology Department graduate level course.
It satisfies graduate elective unit requirements and may be applied to
category C requirements.
Course Objectives and
Student Learning Outcomes
Wherein by University
directive we challenge student to find the actual material for the course
buried in the mountains of required text and restate what we just said in the
course description above using the latest buzzwords- in this case, ÒSLOsÓ. Student
Learning Outcomes are the knowledge, skills, attitudes, competencies, and
habits of mind that our students are expected to acquire.
Graduate
Program SLOs have not been established but we are required to use this template
so I will make them up as I go.
Because Seminar topics change from year to year, there are no standard
embedded questions possible. In BIOL 622, students will be expected to:
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) |
BIOL 622 Course-specific Assessment |
|
Biology M.S. SLO
|
Final Examination Project |
|
Biology M.S. SLO Understanding Research Results from Examination of
the Primary Literature. Students will demonstrate
the ability to determine the primary outcomes of research projects based on
reading primary literature articles. |
In-class presentations Weekly class participation Weekly written summaries of that sessionÕs main topic. |
Required Reading
Selections from the primary
literature accompany each weekÕs presentations. Introductory papers are listed with the
weekly topics. The presenter
working with Dr. Sumida my add to these readings
Students are expected to
have read all assigned material prior
to the beginning of the designated lecture section.
Policy on
Attendance and Recording of Lectures:
All lectures are the copyrighted property of the
instructor. Audio recordings of
lectures may be made for individual use only. They may not be sold, reproduced, or
redistributed in any way. Although
tape recorders may be used as a study aid, they may not be used in lieu of
attendance. Attendance is not
monitored, but it is expected of all students. Students who miss a class session must
acquire the course notes from a fellow classmate. The instructorÕs lecture materials will
not be distributed to individuals in the class.
Office
Hours:
Dr. SumidaÕs office hours will be held in room BI-314
on Tuesdays from 10:00 to 12:00, and Thursdays from 3:00 to 5:00. Additional hours will be added once the
instructorÕs and studentsÕ schedules are evaluated. Additional hours are normally scheduled
near midterm and final examinations. Students may send questions to Dr. Sumida
via e-mail at: ssumida@csusb.edu
E-mailed questions for CSUSB courses are normally answered within 48
hours. Answers may be to multiple
students if more than one student asks a similar question via e-mail. To facilitate speed of response, please
make some kind of reference to Biology 622 in the subject line.
Web Resources
Please note,
web resources for this course are on Dr. SumidaÕs webpage, and not on
Blackboard. The class syllabus,
updates on grades, and summaries of lecture activities are available as
PowerPoint and PDF files will be available on the course website: http://www.stuartsumida.com/BIOL622/622Gateway.htm
Please note, all files are currently available, but these files could be
changed and updated as new information becomes available for any particular
topic. Please check for updates
periodically. These files are meant as a study aid only and without the
accompanying lecture information do not represent a complete overview of the
course. They are intellectual
property of the instructor, Dr. Stuart Sumida, and are for student use in
Biology 622 only and may not be otherwise distributed or reproduced.
Grading Policy
Grading
Procedures:
á
A total of 500
points will be available subdivided into the following categories:
á
In-class
participation – 45 points (nine classes, 5 points each week)
á
Weekly summaries
of presentations (not required for the week student runs a presentation) due
week following presentation.– 45 points (nine
presentations, 5 points each summary)
á
In-class
presentation – 200 points
á
Final Project
due at beginning of class session, finals week – 210 points
Weekly
Summary of Presentations -- Details
For each weekÕs presentation students will provide
Dr. Sumida with a summary in the following elements: (1) a tabular list of major taxa of the
group, the locality data of their recovery, and time period of recovery; and
(2) One major concept learned from that session – no more than one
paragraph in length
In-class
Presentation – Details
Each week Dr. Sumida will address one or more of the
major groups of basal amniotes. He
will provide an anatomical overview of each group defining features and its
phylogenetic relationships.
(Students are expected to have a working knowledge of vertebrate
skeletal anatomy for an understanding of these features.)
Each week one student will follow Dr.
Sumida and provide an overview of:
the taxa included in that group, major subgroups if applicable, the
biogeographic distribution of these taxa, and a temporal summary of them as
well. A standard geological
time-scale for the time periods necessary to describing the temporal
distribution of the taxa may be found at:
http://www.stuartsumida.com/BIOL622/TimescaleSlideBIOL622.pptx
There
will be no presenting student for week one; Dr. Sumida will provide the
overview so that no time is lost and so that students with less paleontological
background can be provided with a clear example of how to organize their
presentations.
Final Class
Project – Details
The final class project will be a paper
in the form of an introduction to a research paper submission for one of the major
groups covered in weeks 1-10. The
paper should include an overview of the group, itÕs
taxa, biogeographic and temporal distribution. The projects will be written in the form
of one of the following Journals:
á
Journal of Paleontology
á
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology
á
Palaeontology (Britain)
All literature cited must be included
with journal citations in the format required of the respective journal. If a figure is included, the figure
legend must be formatted according to the requirements of the respective
journal.
Grading
Criteria:
The course is not graded on a curve. Letter grades are not assigned for
individual components; rather they are based on the cumulative points. Grades will be set according to the
criteria listed below. There is no extra credit work available.
Grade |
Percentage
of Total Points |
|
|
|||
A |
93-100 |
B- |
80-81 |
D |
60-69 |
|
A- |
90-92 |
C+ |
77-79 |
F |
Below 60 |
|
B+ |
87-89 |
C |
72-76 |
|
|
|
B |
82-86 |
C- |
70-71 |
|
|
|
University Policies
Students are referred to the
ÒGeneral Regulations and Procedures" in the CSUSB Bulletin of Courses for
the universityÕs policies on course withdrawal, cheating, and plagiarism. Below are examples only.
Sample text: Students are expected to be familiar
with the UniversityÕs Policy on cheating and Plagiarism. Please review this at
(CSUSB Bulletin, pages 51-52). Instances
of academic dishonesty will not be tolerated. Plagiarism (presenting the work
of another as your own, or the use of another personÕs ideas without giving
proper credit) will result in a failing grade and sanctions by the University.
For this class, all assignments are to be completed by the individual student
unless otherwise specified.
Campus
Policy in Compliance with the American Disabilities Act
Note: it is the student's
responsibility to seek academic accommodations for a verified disability in a
timely manner.
Support for
Students with Disabilities
If you
are in need of an accommodation for a disability in order to participate in this
class, please see the instructor and contact Services to Students with
Disabilities at (909) 537-5238.
If you
require assistance in the event of an emergency, you are advised to establish a
buddy system with a buddy and an alternate buddy in the class. Individuals with
disabilities should prepare for an emergency ahead of time by instructing a
classmate and the instructor.
Course Schedule and
Reading Assignments
Refer to the schedule below for topics, activities,
and reading assignments. (Note: subject to change with fair notice.)
The major groups are taken from the phylogeny
below. This phylogeny is the
current best available hypothesis of relationships of basal amniotes and their
closest sister-taxa.
Week |
Date |
Topic/Activity - Group(s) Covered, Presenting Class
Member, |
Initial Reading Assignments |
|
|
|
|
1 |
1/9 |
Class Logistics; Introduction; Course
Scope. Diadectomorpha
|
Berman et al. (1992); Sumida et al. (1992) |
2 |
1/16 |
Synapsida - Caseosauria |
Maddin
et al. (2008); Reisz
et al. (2009) |
3 |
1/23 |
Synapsida - Eupelycosauria |
Reisz
et al. (1992); Berman et al.
(1995); Reisz (1986) (reference only) |
4 |
1/30 |
Reptilia, Family Captorhinidae |
Dodick
and Modesto (1995); Sumida et al.
(2010) |
5 |
2/6 |
Protorthyrididiae + Araeoscelidia |
Reisz
(1981); Reisz et
al. (1984); MŸller (2006) ;MŸller and Reisz (2006) |
6 |
2/13 |
Dr. Sumida away from campus. |
No class meeting |
7 |
2/20 |
Mesosauridae + Millerettidae
+ Lanthanosuchidae |
Modesto (2006); Modesto (2010); deBraga and Reisz (1996); Cisneros et al. (2008) |
8 |
2/27 |
Bolosauridae + Nyctiphruretus |
Berman et al. (2000); Reisz et al. (2007);
MŸller et al. (2007); Falconnet (2012) |
9 |
3/6 |
Procolophonoidea |
Diaz da Silva et al. (2006);
Cisneros (2008); Cisneros and Ruta (2010) |
10 |
3/13 |
Pareiasauromorpha |
Tsuji (2006); Tsuji et al.
(2012) |
Final |
3/20 |
|
|
Course Reading
Assignments
Berman, D. S, S. S.
Sumida, and R. E. Lombard.
1992. Reinterpretation of the temporal and occipital
regions in Diadectes
and the relationships of diadectomorphs. Journal
of Paleontology, 66:481-499.
Berman,
D. S, R. R. Reisz, J. R. Bolt, and D. Scott. 1995. The cranial anatomy and relationships of
the synapsid Varanosaurus
(Eupelycosauria: Ophiacodontidae)
from the Early Permian of Texas and Oklahoma. Annals of Carnegie Museum,
64:99-133.
Berman,
D. S, R. R Reisz, D. Scott, A. C. Henrici,
S. S. Sumida, and T. Martens. 2000. Early Permian bipedal reptile. Science, 290:969-972.
Cisneros,
J. C.
2008. Phylogenetic
relationships of procolophonid parareptiles
with remarks on their geological record.
Journal of Systematic Palaeontology,
6:345-366.
Cisneros,
J. C. and M. Ruta, 2010. Morphological
diversity and biogeography of procolophonids (Amniota: Parareptilia). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 8:607-625
Cisneros,
J.C., B. S. Rubidge, R. Mason, and C. Dube. 2008.
Analysis of millerettid parareptile
relationships in the light of new material of Broomia
perplexa Watson, 1914, from the Permian of South
Africa. Journal
of Systematic Palaeontology, 6:453–462.
deBraga, M. and R. R. Reisz. 1996: The Early Permian reptile Acleistorhinus
pteroticus and its phylogenetic position. Journal
of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16:384-395.
Dias-da-Silva, S., S. P. Modesto,
and C. L. Schultz. 2006. New
material of Procolophon (Parareptilia:
Procolophonoidea) from the
Lower Triassic of Brazil, with remarks on the
ages of the Sanga do Cabral and Buena Vista
formations of South America. Canadian
Journal of Earth Science, 43:1685-1693.
Falconnet,
J. 2012. First evidence of a bolosaurid
parareptile in France (latest Carboniferous-earliest
Permian of the Autun basin) and the spatiotemporal
distribution of the Bolosauridae. Bulletin SocietŽ GŽological France,
183:495-608.
Maddin, H. C., C. A. Sicdor,
and R. R. Reisz. 2008. Cranial anatomy of Ennatosaurus tecton (Syynapsida:
Caseidae) from the Middle Permian of Russia and the
evolutionary relationships of Caseidae. Journal
of Vertebrate Paleontology, 28:160-180.
Modesto, S. P. 2006. The
cranial skeleton of the Early Permian aquatic reptile Mesosaurus tenuidens: implications for
relationships and palaeobiology. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society,
146:345–368.
Modesto, S. P. 2010. The postcranial skeleton of the aquatic parareptile
Mesosaurus tenuidens
from the Gondwanan Permian. Journal
of Vertebrate Paleontology, 30:1378-1390.
Modesto, S. P., D. M. Scott, D. S Berman, J. MŸller,
and R. R. Reisz. 2007.The skull and the palaeoecological significance of Labidosaurus hamatus, a captorhinid
reptile from the Lower Permian of Texas.
Zoological
Journal of the Linnean Society. 149:237–262.
MŸller,
J., Li, J.-L.,and R. R. Reisz. 2007.A new bolosaurid parareptile, Belebey chengi sp. nov., from the Middle Permian of China and its paleogeographic significance. Naturwissenschaften, 95:1169–1174.
MŸller,
J., and R. R. Reisz. 2006. The phylogeny of early eureptiles: comparing parsimony and Baysian
appreoaches in the investigation of a basal fossil
clade. Systematic Biology, 55:503-511.
Reisz, R. R. 1980.
A diapsid reptile from the
Pennsylvanian of Kansas. Univeristy of Kansas
Museum of natural history Special Publication No. 7. 74pp.
Reisz, R. R. , D. S
Berman, and D. Scott. 1984. The
anatomy and relationships of the Lower Permian reptile Araeoscelis. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 4:57-67.
Reisz, R. R. , D. S Berman, and
D. Scott. 1992. The
cranial anatomy and relationships of Secodontosaurus,
an unusual mammal-like reptile (Synapsida: Sphenacodontidae) from the early Permian of Texas. Zoological
Journal of the Linnean Society, 104:127–184
Reisz, R. R., J. MŸller, L. Tsuji, and D. Scott.
2007. The cranial osteology of Belebey vegrandis (Parareptilia: Bolosauridae), from
the Middle Permian of Russia, and its bearing on reptilian evolution. Zoological Journal of the Linnean
Society, 151:191–214.
Reisz, R. R., S. J. Godfrey, and D.
Scott. 2009. Eothyris and Oedaleops: Do These Early Permian Synapsids
from Texas and New Mexico form a Clade?
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology,
29:39-47.
Sumida, S. S., R. E. Lombard, and
D. S Berman. 1992. Morphology of the atlas-axis complex of
the Late Palaeozoic tetrapod Suborders Diadectomorpha and Seymouriamorpha.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society of London, 336:259-273
Sumida,
S. S., J. Dodick, A. Metcalf, and G. Albright. 2010. Reiszorhinus olsoni, a new single-tooth-rowed captorhinid
reptile from the Lower Permian of Texas. Journal
of Vertebrate Paleontology, 30:704-714.
Tsuji,
L. 2006. Cranial
anatomy and phylogenetic affinities of the Permian parareptile
Macroleter poezicus. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology,
26:849-865.
Tsuji,
L., J. MŸller, and R. Reisz. 2012. Anatomy of Emeroleter levis and the phylogeny of the Nycteroleter parareptiles. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology,
32:45-67.
Return to Biology 622 Home Page
Return to Dr. SumidaÕs Home Page